Protect Pekin - No Data Centers Protect Pekin Back to Home

What Is a Hyper-Scale AI Data Center?

The facility proposed for Pekin is not a typical server room or cloud storage warehouse. It is an AI compute super cluster - one of the most resource-intensive types of industrial facilities ever built. Here is what that means for our community.

Traditional Data Centers vs. AI Super Clusters

Most people hear "data center" and think of the server rooms that power email, websites, and cloud storage. Traditional data centers have existed for decades and typically consume 5-30 megawatts (MW) of power. They run standard processors (CPUs), generate moderate heat, and use predictable amounts of water and electricity.[1]

An AI hyper-scale data center is a fundamentally different kind of facility. These campuses are purpose-built to run artificial intelligence workloads - training and operating the large language models behind tools like ChatGPT, image generators, and autonomous systems. Instead of CPUs, they are packed with thousands of graphics processing units (GPUs) and specialized AI accelerators that consume far more power per chip and produce far more heat.[2]

40-132 kW per rack
AI-optimized racks consume 40-132 kW of power, compared to 5-15 kW for traditional server racks. A single NVIDIA H100 GPU draws 700 watts; the newer B200 draws 1,000-1,200 watts. An NVIDIA GB200 NVL72 rack - the current state of the art - consumes 132 kW; the next generation is expected to reach 240 kW per rack.
Source: NVIDIA specifications; TRG Datacenters; Tom's Hardware

What Does "Super Cluster" Mean?

A "super cluster" refers to a massive aggregation of AI computing capacity - tens of thousands to hundreds of thousands of specialized GPUs connected by high-speed, low-latency networking, functioning as one giant supercomputer across multiple buildings on a single campus. A single super cluster might require 50-100+ megawatts, and full campuses can deliver hundreds of megawatts or even gigawatts of compute power. These facilities are at the very top of the data center scale.[3]

The largest AI data center projects currently being built in the United States illustrate the staggering scale: OpenAI's Stargate project ($500 billion committed, nearly 7 GW of planned capacity across multiple sites); Elon Musk's xAI Colossus in Memphis (2 GW, 555,000 GPUs, the world's largest single-site AI training installation); and Meta's Hyperion in Louisiana (over 2 GW, 2,250 acres, 4 million square feet). These campuses span hundreds to thousands of acres and cost tens of billions of dollars to build.[4]

10-17× Pekin's load
Pekin likely uses roughly 30-50 MW of total electricity. A single large AI data center at 500 MW would consume 10 to 17 times the electricity of the entire city. A gigawatt-scale facility (1,000 MW) would consume 20-33 times as much. Per Pew Research Center, a typical AI-optimized hyperscale center uses as much electricity as 100,000 homes per year - Pekin has roughly 14,000 households.
Source: Pew Research Center, October 2025; U.S. EIA; Electricity Local - Pekin, IL

Scale Comparison: Numbers That Matter

The numbers associated with these facilities are staggering when compared to a community like Pekin (population ~32,000):

The U.S. Data Center Boom

The demand for AI computing power is driving an unprecedented expansion of data center construction across the United States. According to the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, U.S. data center electricity usage grew from 58 TWh in 2014 to 176 TWh in 2023 (4.4% of total U.S. electricity) and is projected to reach 325-580 TWh by 2028 (6.7-12% of total U.S. electricity). The International Energy Agency projects data centers will drive almost half of U.S. electricity demand growth through 2030. By then, U.S. data centers are expected to consume more electricity than all energy-intensive manufacturing combined - aluminum, steel, cement, and chemicals.[8]

This gold rush has sent developers scouting for sites in small and mid-sized communities where land is cheap, regulations are lighter, and local governments may be persuaded with promises of tax revenue and jobs. As of mid-2025, $64 billion worth of U.S. data center projects had been blocked or delayed by community opposition across 28 states. Communities like Pekin may be attractive to developers precisely because they lack the regulatory infrastructure to scrutinize these projects adequately.[9]

Why This Matters for Pekin

WHP LLC (Western Hospitality Partners) has proposed building an AI data center "super cluster" on the Lutticken Property - recently annexed Groveland Township farmland. While specific capacity figures have not been publicly disclosed, the use of the term "super cluster" indicates a facility at the very large end of the spectrum.

A facility of this type would place enormous demands on Pekin's water supply, electrical grid, and natural environment. It would generate constant industrial noise, require massive diesel backup systems, and permanently destroy productive farmland. The benefits - primarily tax revenue and a relatively small number of permanent jobs - flow to outside investors, while the costs are borne disproportionately by the community.

The following pages explore each of these impacts in detail:

Sources

  1. U.S. Department of Energy / Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. "2024 United States Data Center Energy Usage Report." December 2024. eta.lbl.gov
  2. Tom's Hardware. "The Data Center Cooling State of Play 2025." tomshardware.com. See also: TRG Datacenters. "NVIDIA H100 Power Consumption Guide." trgdatacenters.com
  3. Data Center Ltd. "SuperClusters: The New Frontier of Data Center Infrastructure." datacenterltd.com. See also: IEEE ComSoc. "Superclusters of Nvidia GPU/AI chips." comsoc.org
  4. OpenAI. "Five New Stargate Sites." openai.com. See also: Fortune. "Meta's Hyperion AI Data Center Will Sprawl to Four Times the Size of Manhattan's Central Park." February 2026. fortune.com. See also: Introl. "xAI Colossus Hits 2 GW." introl.com
  5. Pew Research Center. "What We Know About Energy Use at US Data Centers Amid the AI Boom." October 2025. pewresearch.org. See also: Electricity Local. "Pekin, IL Electricity Rates." electricitylocal.com
  6. Oregon Public Broadcasting. "As Google's Water Demands Grow, The Dalles Aims to Pull More from Mount Hood Forest." January 2026. opb.org. See also: EESI. "Data Centers and Water Consumption." eesi.org
  7. Virginia Mercury. "Data Centers' Diesel Generators Are a Top Concern for Virginians." January 2026. virginiamercury.com. See also: U.S. EPA. "Clean Air Act Resources for Data Centers." epa.gov
  8. International Energy Agency. "Energy and AI - Energy Demand from AI." iea.org. See also: DOE / LBNL. "2024 United States Data Center Energy Usage Report." eta.lbl.gov
  9. Data Center Watch. "$64 Billion of Data Center Projects Blocked or Delayed." datacenterwatch.org. See also: Washington Post. "The Data Center Rebellion Is Reshaping the Political Landscape." January 2026. washingtonpost.com

Take Action

Our community deserves a say in decisions that affect our water, power, air, and land. Make your voice heard.

Get Involved