Protect Pekin - No Data Centers Protect Pekin Back to Home

Noise & Air Pollution

Data centers are 24/7 industrial operations. Industrial cooling systems produce constant noise, while diesel backup generators emit harmful pollutants. Residents near existing facilities report disrupted sleep, declining health, and falling property values.

Industrial Noise: The Constant Hum

Data centers operate massive cooling systems - chillers, cooling towers, air handlers, and fans - that run continuously, 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. These systems generate a persistent low-frequency hum that carries far beyond the facility's property line.[1]

At the source, cooling towers, HVAC systems, and air handlers generate 85-100 dBA per unit, and a single data center may have up to a dozen rooftop air handling units. Low-frequency sound components travel large distances and pass through residential windows "virtually unattenuated." Disturbing noise levels have been documented extending up to 3,000 feet from data centers, with detectable noise measured as far as over two miles away.[2]

60%+ of the time
In Prince William County, Virginia, noise measurements at the Great Oak neighborhood - adjacent to Amazon data centers with 424 air exhaust vents on four buildings - exceeded county ordinance limits (60 dB daytime / 55 dB nighttime) more than 60% of the time over a three-month measurement period. The 291 homes in the subdivision report a "persistent low-frequency hum that shakes walls and disrupts sleep."
Source: Prince William Times; Data Center Dynamics; noise monitoring data

Low-Frequency and Infrasonic Noise

Particularly concerning is the low-frequency component of data center noise. Large cooling systems produce sound at frequencies below 200 Hz, and some components generate infrasound below the range of human hearing (under 20 Hz). Low-frequency noise is harder to block with walls, windows, and insulation, and it penetrates buildings more effectively than higher-frequency sounds.[3]

A peer-reviewed systematic review found associations between low-frequency noise exposure and annoyance, sleep-related problems, concentration difficulties, and headache in adult populations. Standard A-weighted decibel measurements (dBA) understate the impact of low-frequency noise because A-weighting attenuates low frequencies - meaning data center noise may comply with dBA-based ordinances while still causing significant disturbance inside homes.[4]

Health Effects of Chronic Noise

The World Health Organization identifies environmental noise as one of the top environmental risks to health. Chronic exposure to noise levels above 40 dB at night disrupts sleep architecture, leading to:[5]

The WHO recommends bedroom noise levels below 30 dBA for good quality sleep and average nighttime outdoor noise below 40 dB. Above 45 dB nighttime, there is a 10% risk of a highly annoyed population. At levels of 59.3 dB, there is a 5% increased risk of certain types of heart disease. The WHO estimates environmental noise exposure causes a loss of more than 1.5 million healthy life years per year in Western Europe alone.[5]

The proposed data center site on the Lutticken Property is surrounded by residential neighborhoods, with 9 schools within 3 miles. Children's developing brains are particularly sensitive to chronic noise exposure, which has been shown to impair reading comprehension, memory, and academic performance.[6]

Diesel Generator Emissions

Every large data center maintains extensive diesel backup power systems. In Virginia alone, nearly 9,000 diesel generators have been permitted at data centers, with 4,700 in eastern Loudoun County alone. One Amazon data center permit contemplates up to 10 million gallons of diesel fuel annually. Approximately 65% of all data centers rely on diesel generators for backup power.[7]

Diesel generators produce a cocktail of harmful air pollutants:

9,000 generators
Nearly 9,000 diesel generators have been permitted at data centers across Virginia alone - with 4,700 in eastern Loudoun County. Diesel generators are federally limited to 100 hours of non-emergency use per year, but 50 of those hours can be used for "demand response" programs where grid operators pay data centers to switch to backup generators, increasing pollution exposure for nearby communities.
Source: Virginia Mercury, January 2026; Sierra Club Virginia; Inside Climate News

What Residents Near Data Centers Report

Great Oak / Prince William County, Virginia (Amazon AWS)

The Great Oak neighborhood - 291 single-family homes - has been overwhelmed by noise from adjacent Amazon data centers with 424 air exhaust vents on four buildings. Residents describe "catastrophic noise" and a "persistent low-frequency hum that shakes walls and disrupts sleep." Noise measurements exceeded county ordinance limits more than 60% of the time over a three-month monitoring period. Residents have reported migraines, anxiety, sleep disruption, and inability to concentrate. In response, the county has proposed new stricter noise limits of 52 dB daytime / 47 dB nighttime.[9]

Chandler, Arizona (CyrusOne)

Residents near CyrusOne's Chandler facility compared the humming to "mosquito buzzing" and reported windows rattling at night. The noise persisted at all hours for more than two years. CyrusOne installed sound attenuation measures, but they only worked about 60% of the time. The city considered banning new data centers entirely.[10]

Southaven, Mississippi (xAI / Elon Musk)

Residents reported a "whirring mechanical noise like a leaf blower" from 59 natural gas turbines about half a mile away, running day and night. Mississippi regulators were not monitoring air emissions from 18 operating turbines. A petition by the Safe and Sound Coalition gathered over 700 signatures demanding action. The NAACP raised environmental justice concerns about impacts on predominantly Black communities surrounding the facility.[11]

Property Value Impacts

Commercial and industrial uses have been found to depress residential property values within 300 feet of the source. Noise may be the single data center impact most likely to lower property values. In Peculiar, Missouri, residents cited fear of significant property value decreases as a primary objection to a proposed data center.[12]

Note: A George Mason University study found aggregate home prices higher near data centers in Northern Virginia - but this likely reflects correlated factors like tax base growth in commercial corridors, and may mask real harm to immediately adjacent residential properties.[12]

What Pekin Should Demand

Illinois Noise Regulations

Illinois noise regulations are found in 35 IAC Part 901 (Sound Emission Standards), administered by the Illinois Pollution Control Board. The regulations classify land as Class A (residential), Class B (commercial), or Class C (industrial), with allowable octave band sound pressure levels for noise from any class to any receiving class.[13]

Limits are set for both daytime and nighttime hours, with nighttime limits being stricter. However, the Illinois EPA does not have an active noise control program; enforcement falls to the Pollution Control Board. Importantly, there are no Illinois-specific data center regulations - zoning, setbacks, and noise conditions are set at the municipal and county level.[13]

Sources

  1. Data Center Knowledge. "5 Main Causes of Noise in Data Centers." datacenterknowledge.com
  2. Industrial Noise & Vibration Centre. "Data Center Noise Attenuation." invc.com
  3. PMC. "Evaluation of Low-Frequency Noise, Infrasound, and Health Symptoms." 2023. pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  4. PubMed. "Health effects from low-frequency noise and infrasound - systematic review." pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  5. WHO Europe. "Environmental Noise Guidelines for the European Region." 2018. who.int. See also: WHO. "Noise Fact Sheet." who.int
  6. Nature. "Noise causes cardiovascular disease." 2024. nature.com. See also: APHA. "Noise as a Public Health Hazard." apha.org
  7. Virginia Mercury. "Data Centers' Diesel Generators Are a Top Concern for Virginians." January 2026. virginiamercury.com
  8. Inside Climate News. "Data Centers' Use of Diesel Generators Is Commonplace and Problematic." November 2025. insideclimatenews.org. See also: Sierra Club Virginia. "Looser Rules, Dirtier Air." sierraclub.org
  9. Prince William Times. "Coming Crackdown on Data Center Noise Won't Help Great Oak." princewilliamtimes.com. See also: Data Center Dynamics. "Prince William Residents Complain of Catastrophic Noise." datacenterdynamics.com
  10. Data Center Dynamics. "CyrusOne Forced to Take Action Following Noise Complaints in Chandler, Arizona." datacenterdynamics.com. See also: ABC15. "Chandler to Consider Banning Data Centers." abc15.com
  11. Mississippi Today. "Southaven Residents Fear Pollution from xAI Turbines." November 2025. mississippitoday.org
  12. Schar School/GMU. "Home Prices Higher Near Data Centers." schar.gmu.edu. See also: Collateral Analytics. "Impact of Noise on Residential Property Value." collateralanalytics.com
  13. Illinois General Assembly. "35 IAC Part 901 - Sound Emission Standards." ilga.gov. See also: Illinois EPA. "Noise Pollution." epa.illinois.gov
  14. U.S. EPA. "Clean Air Act Resources for Data Centers." July 2025. epa.gov

Take Action

Our community deserves a say in decisions that affect our water, power, air, and land. Make your voice heard.

Get Involved